Saturday, May 24, 2014

The Confabulist

The Confabulist / Steven Galloway
Toronto: Knopf, c2014.
304 p.

The Confabulist takes on the life of Houdini, re-imagines it, and places it into the context of the confused memories of Martin Strauss, a man who is convinced that he killed Houdini...twice.

Martin is telling us the story of his own life, in brief interludes between longer chapters which follow Ehrich Weiss as he becomes Houdini. It's not quite clear how they will mesh at the beginning, but I was willing to wait to see how they'd be drawn together as the book progressed.

As the story continues, though, it becomes both more predictable and less convincing. Galloway turns Houdini's career into a speculative spying operation, placing Houdini within the circle of many world leaders, and having him play a role in Secret Service operations. I'm not certain if this was supposed to be a reimagining of Houdini by Galloway, or an increasingly strange confabulation of Martin's as he is telling his story of Houdini to a young woman identified, by Martin, as Houdini's illegitimate daughter Alice (but who is obviously someone else, someone easily guessed by the reader, making the ultimate reveal not very enlightening or surprising).

Ultimately, I was disappointed in the read, and bored in the last sections. I should know by now that I am definitely not the market for books featuring real people as primary characters -- it always irritates and bothers me. If I want to know about someone, I'll read a biography. While there is of course no absolute certainty as to the truth of biographies either, at least they are attempting to tell a true story; fiction using real people always feels to me like stealing someone's soul.

Galloway has clearly read a lot about Houdini. He's able to paint a lively picture of the world of vaudeville and stage magicians, an area I really love and have read a fair bit about myself. But the structure and the framing device ultimately didn't work for me. Martin Strauss is a vague character with not enough to him to compel interest; the conclusion is telegraphed too far ahead, and sadly, feels banal to me. I thought that this novel started strong, and was moving along quickly at first, but I got bogged down in the "what is true and what is made up" confusion that overtakes these kind of novels. Not the read for me.

2 comments:

  1. I've been waiting for another book from Galloway, but I'm more nervous now! Though maybe I shouldn't be-- I'm not put off by novels with real people as primary characters. (I loved Colony of Unrequited Dreams, for instance, even if it did make me a little uncomfortable for Joey Smallwood's surviving relatives.) Does that mean you're not a fan of historical fiction in general, or just the ones with real figures as the central characters?

    I'm still reluctant about those boring last sections, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If real people as main characters doesn't bother you, you should be okay with this one -- I don't mind historical fiction, but prefer real people to be incidental characters rather than the main ones. I'm uncomfortable with the feeling that the author is co-opting this real person's thoughts and feelings.

      I think I was a bit bored because I was getting impatient with the conceit that the story was based on -- you might like it more than I did, so would find it less boring :) Let me know what you think!

      Delete

Thanks for stopping by ~ I hope you will leave your comments and reflections to let me know what you think!